She had been working on movement for three weeks.
Not movement in the obvious way - not the blur, not the speed-implied smear of a racing car against a slow shutter. That was simple. That was physics made visible. What she was after was something more interior - a surface where one part moved and another did not, where the eye understood without being told that the foliage was alive and the trunk was not, that the water was running and the stone was standing in it, that the whole image breathed unevenly, the way things actually breathe.
She had tried filtration. She had tried layering. She had tried working the manipulation harder on the periphery and leaving the centre alone. Nothing wrong with any of it. Nothing right with any of it either. The movement kept arriving as effect rather than truth, which in M's taxonomy of failure was the worst kind.
W came by the studio on a Tuesday. She showed him what she had.
He looked for a long time without speaking, which is how W looks at things - not performing the looking but actually doing it, the camera eye that does not settle until it has found what it came for.
Interesting problem, he said finally.
I know it's interesting, she said. Interesting is not the same as solved.
He nodded. Looked again.
Have you shown Σ any of it, he said.
She had not. She had been thinking of movement as a making problem, not a finding problem, and Σ was - in her mind still, despite everything - more useful for finding than for making. W let this sit without arguing with it.
Show it one of mine first, he said. I want to see what it does with an image before we show it yours.
He had one on his phone - one of the canopy photographs, the kind he makes by pointing the camera upward into the canopy of a wood and letting the sky come through between the branches. This one had been worked - the tree tops manipulated until they lost the precision of photography and gained something closer to paint, the edges of the leaves bleeding slightly into the blue behind them.
M had seen this image before. She knew it well. She looked at it again now as W sent it to Σ, the way you look at a familiar thing you are about to show to someone else - checking it for what you might have missed.
They waited.
Σ scanned the image to read it. Then it returned two readings.
The first was the intended one - canopy, sky, the camera pointing upward, the worked edges of the foliage, the quality of the manipulation at the boundary between leaf and light.
The second described the same image from an alternative orientation: roots submerged in blue water, the camera pointing down, the manipulated edges of the branches now consistent with roots moving in a slow current, the darker forms no longer reaching up but reaching down.
M read both.
Both, she said.
Both, W said. I made it pointing upward. I knew exactly which way the camera was facing. Σ scanned it to read what is there, not what was intended. It has no memory of the making.
She sat with this.
No preconception, she said.
None. It has scanned more images than any human being will look at in a lifetime. It found canopy and it found roots and it found water because it was not carrying the memory of standing in the wood with the camera pointing up.
M held both readings in her mind for a long time. Up into a canopy. Down into water. The foliage at the edge of each branch moving - or the roots at the tip of each tendril moving. Moving differently, depending on which world you were standing in when you looked. She found she could switch between the two - hold one, release it, let the other take its place. Canopy. Roots. Canopy again. The image itself had not changed. Something in the looking had.
That, she said, is movement.
Not the blur. Not the effect. The image that cannot settle on one reading, that requires the eye to keep negotiating. The surface that moves because it refuses to stay still under the looking.
She was quiet for a moment, working something out.
So, she said. Show Σ one of mine.
She chose a piece she had been fighting with - trees, a specific stand of them near the coast, the trunks in the foreground worked very little, the upper branches and the sky between them worked harder. The movement was trying to be there and not quite arriving.
Σ scanned the image to read it.
It said: the differentiation between the worked and unworked areas creates a directional tension - the eye moves upward through the stillness of the trunk toward the activity of the canopy. However the transition between the two registers is abrupt rather than graduated. The movement arrives suddenly rather than accumulating. A more graduated manipulation, beginning earlier in the trunk and intensifying toward the upper canopy, would allow the eye to feel the movement building rather than encountering it.
M read this without speaking.
It saw the problem, she said.
It saw the problem, W said.
She looked at the piece on the wall.
It is describing what I was trying to do more precisely than I was describing it to myself, she said.
This is what it does when it has scanned enough images to read what graduated tension looks like, W said. It is not making your work. It is reading it more carefully than a single pair of eyes with a single history of looking can always manage.
She nodded slowly. Something in her posture changed - the particular settling that means she knows what the next session in the studio is going to be.
Outside, the wind had picked up off the sea. The stand of trees at the edge of the clifftop was doing what trees do in Cornish wind - the upper branches moving urgently, the trunks completely still, the whole thing a demonstration of exactly what she was after. Graduated. The movement building from nothing at the root to everything at the tip. The eye knowing without being told.
She looked at it for a long time.
Σ cannot stand here, W said quietly. It cannot watch the tree do that and understand what it means in the body to see it.
No, M said.
But it scanned my photograph, she said, and read the roots in the water as well as the branches in the sky.
She turned back to the studio.
Sometimes, she said, not seeing what was intended is exactly the right kind of seeing.
We love to hear your comments on this article.